Behind Bars: Why Cage Housing in Laying Hens Should Be Banned

  • Victoria Marincheva Department of Anatomy, Physiology, and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Forestry, 10 Kliment Ohridski Blvd, Sofia 1000, Bulgaria
  • Iliyan Manev Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Forestry https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7733-4840
Keywords: Welfare, Egg-Laying Hens, Furnished Cages, Alternative Systems

Abstract

The argument about the advantages and disadvantages of cage and cage-free housing in laying hens has long been a hot topic in social and scientific circles. The debate gained popularity again after wide public support and the positive response of the European Commission to the  European Citizens' Initiative “End the Cage Age” in 2021. Welfare organizations have set their efforts to transform existing legislation into more ethical and sustainable farming systems based on documented behavior characteristics and enhanced human-to-animal relationships. Recently several reports have been published to offer insights into all questions concerning management, production, health issues, and profitability in the sector. The effect of short-term subsidies and educational programs have also been discussed as future measures if the ban on furnished cages is realized. This article aims to describe and analyze the current situation to search for alternatives that can ease the transition to cage-free husbandry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Appleby, M.C., Mench, J.A., Hughes B.O. (2004). Poultry behaviour and welfare. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.

Baishya, А., Surati, U., Patoliya, P. (2021). Importance of perches in poultry farming. SR Publications. https://www.srpublication.com/importance-of-perches-in-poultry-farming/. Accessed on April 6. 2023.

Best Practice Hens. (2022a). The choice of genetics for hens for cage-free systems. https://www.ptonline.com/articles/how-to-get-better-mfi-results. Accessed on April 10. 2023.

Best Practice Hens. (2022b). Training for farmers and staff to handle and care for hens in cage-free. housing systems. https://bestpracticehens.eu/about-the-project/. Accessed on April 10. 2023.

Bishop, S.C., Fleming, R.H., McCormack, H.A., Flock, D.K., Whitehead, C.C. (2000). Inheritance of bone characteristics affecting osteoporosis in laying hens. Br Poult Sci, 41(1): 33-40. DOI: 10.1080/00071660086376

Brambell, F.W.R. (1965). Report of the technical committee to require into the welfare of animals kept under intensive husbandry systems. HM Stationary Office: London, United Kingdom.

Brantsæter, M., Nordgreen, J., Rodenburg, T.B., Tahamtani, F.M., Popova, A., Janczak, A.M. (2016a). Exposure to Increased Environmental Complexity during Rearing Reduces Fearfulness and Increases Use of Three-Dimensional Space in Laying Hens (Gallus gallus domesticus). Front Vet Sci, 3:14. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00014

Brantsæter, M., Tahamtani F.M., Moe, R.O., Hansen, T.B., Orritt, R., Nicol, C., Janczak, A.M. (2016b). Rearing Laying Hens in Aviaries Reduces Fearfulness following Transfer to Furnished Cages. Front Vet Sci, 3:13. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00013

Brown, А.А., Sobotik, E.B., House, G.M., Nelson, J.R., Archer, G.S. (2022). Differences in fear response strategy and stress susceptibility amongst four different commercial layer strains reared cage free. Front Physiol, 13: 943471. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.943471

Campbell, D.L.M. (2020). Skeletal health of layers across all housing systems and future research directions for Australia. Animal Production Science, 61(10) 883-892. DOI: 10.1071/AN19578

Campbell, D.L.M., de Haas, E.N., Lee, C. (2019). A review of environmental enrichment for laying hens during rearing in relation to their behavioral and physiological development. Poult Sci, 98(1):9-28. DOI: 10.3382/ps/pey319.

Casey-Trott, T.M., Guerin, M.T., Sandilands, V., Torrey, S., Widowski, T.M. (2017). Rearing system affects prevalence of keel-bone damage in laying hens: a longitudinal study of four consecutive flocks. Poultry Science, 96(7): 2029-2039. DOI: 10.3382/ps/pex026

Casey-Trott, T.M., Widowski, T.M. (2016). Behavioral Differences of Laying Hens with Fractured Keel Bones within Furnished Cages. Front Vet Sci, 3:42. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00042

Castellini, C., Perella, F., Mugnai, C., dal Bosco, A. (2002). Welfare, productivity and qualitative traits of egg in laying hens reared under different rearing systems. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 1804.

Compassion in World Farming EU. (2021). Scientific briefing on caged farming. https://www.ciwf.eu/media/7444223/ciwf-february-2021-scientific-briefing-on-caged-farming.pdf. Accessed on April 3. 2023.

Dawkins, M.S. (1989). Time budgets in Red Junglefowl as a baseline for the assessment of welfare in domestic fowl. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 24:77-80.

de Haas, E.N., Bolhuis, J.E., Kemp, B., Groothuis, T.G.G., Rodenburg, T.B. (2014). Parents and early life environment affect behavioral development of laying hen chickens. PLoS ONE, 9(3): e90577. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090577

de Haas, E.N., Kemp, B., Bolhuis, J.E., Groothuis, T., Rodenburg, T.B. (2013). Fear, stress, and feather pecking in commercial white and brown laying hen parent-stock flocks and their relationships with production parameters. Poult Sci, 92(9):2259-69. DOI: 10.3382/ps.2012-02996.

de Haas, E.N., Newberry, R.C., Edgar, J., Riber, A.B., Estevez, I., Ferrante, V., Hernandez, C.E., Kjaer, J.B., Ozkan, S., Dimitrov, I., Rodenburg, T.B., Janczak, A.M. (2021). Prenatal and Early Postnatal Behavioural Programming in Laying Hens, With Possible Implications for the Development of Injurious Pecking. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 8:693. DOI: 10.3389/FVETS.2021.678500/BIBTEX

Dedousi, A., Stojčić, M.D., Sossidou, E. (2020). Effects of housing systems on keel bone damage and egg quality of laying hens. Veterinary Research Forum, 11(4): 299-304. DOI: 10.30466/vrf.2019.99568.2375

Dekker, S .E.M., de Boer, I.J.M., Vermeij, I., Aarnink, A.J.A., Koerkamp, P.W.G.G. (2011). Ecological and economic evaluation of Dutch egg production systems. Livestock Science, 139(1-2): 109-121. DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.011

Dumontier, L., Janczak, A.M., Smulders, T.V., Moe, R.O., Vas, J., Nordgreen, J. (2022). Early life environment and adult enrichment: Effects on fearfulness in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 256:105750. DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2022.105750

Duncan, I.J.H and Hughes, B.O. (1972). Free and operant feeding in domestic fowls. Animal Behaviour, 20:775-7.

Duncan, I.J.H., Kite, V.G. (1989). Nest site selection and nest-building behaviour in domestic fowl. Animal behaviour, 37:215-231

Duncan, I.J.H., Widowski, T.M., Malleau, A.E., Lindberg, C.A., Petherick, C.J. (1998). External factors and causation of dustbathing in domestic hens. Behavioural Processes, 43:219-28.

EFSA et al. (2023). Welfare of laying hens on farm. EFSA Journal 21(2):7789. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7789

Elson, H.A., Croxall, R.A. (2006). European study on the comparative welfare of laying hens in cage and non-cage systems. Arch Geflugelkd, 70: 194-198.

Erasmus, M., Lee, H.C., Kang, I., Swanson, J. (2016). Fear in turkeys, implications for productivity and wellbeing. Zootecnica International. https://zootecnicainternational.com/poultry-facts/fear-turkeys-implications-productivity-wellbeing/. Accessed on April 16. 2023.

Eurogroup for Animals. (2023). Phasing out cages in the EU: the road to a smooth transition. https://www.eurogroupforanimals.org/files/eurogroupforanimals/2023-03/NALB-Phasing%20out%20cages-final.pdf. Accessed on March 20. 2023.

European Commission (Questions and Answers: Commission's response to the European Citizens' Initiative on “End the Cage Age” https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/QANDA_21_3298). Accessed on April 17. 2023.

European Commission. (1998). Council Directive 98/58/EC on the protection of animals kept for farming purposes. https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:31998L0058 Accessed on April 10. 2023.

European Commission. (1999). Council Directive 1999/74/EC of 19 July 1999 laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:31999L0074. Accessed on March 22. 2023.

European Commission. (2023a). EGGS - MARKET SITUATION - DASHBOARD. https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/farming/animal-products/eggs_en. Accessed on April 23. 2023.

European Commission. (2023b). EU market situation for eggs. Committee for the common organisation of the agricultural markets. https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2023-04/eggs-dashboard_en_1.pdf. Accessed on April 23. 2023.

European commission. Food safety. Animal welfare. https://food.ec.europa.eu/animals/animal-welfare_en. Accessed on April 17. 2023.

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). (2023a). Welfare of broilers and laying hens on farm. https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/infographics/welfare-broilers-and-laying-hens-farm. Accessed on March 23. 2023.

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). (2023b). Welfare of laying hens. Plain language summary. EFSA Journal, 21(2):7789. ISSN: 1831-4732

Fawcett, D.L., Casey-Trott, T.M., Jensen, L., Caston, L.J., Widowski, T.M. (2020). Strain differences and effects of different stocking densities during rearing on the musculoskeletal development of pullets. Poult Sci, 99(9): 4153-4161. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.05.046.

Fijn, L.B., van der Staay, F.J., Goerlich-Jansson, V.C., Arndt, S.S. (2020). Importance of Basic Research on the Causes of Feather Pecking in Relation to Welfare. Animals (Basel), 10(2): 213. DOI: 10.3390/ani10020213

Fulton, R.M. (2017). Causes of Normal Mortality in Commercial Egg-Laying Chickens. Avian Diseases, 61(3): 289-95. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26432133.

Gebhardt-Henrich, S.G., Fröhlich, E.K. (2015). Early Onset of Laying and Bumblefoot Favor Keel Bone Fractures. Animals (Basel), 5(4):1192-206. DOI: 10.3390/ani5040406

Gerpe, C., Stratmann, A., Bruckmaier, R., Toscano, M.J. (2021). Examining the catching, carrying, and crating process during depopulation of end-of-lay hens. J Appl Poult Res, 30:100115. DOI: 10.1016/j.japr.2020.100115

Grumbles, L.C. (1959). Cage Layer Fatigue (Cage Paralysis). Avian Diseases, 3(2): 122-125. JSTOR. DOI: 10.2307/1587714

Guesdon, V., Faure, J.M. (2004). Laying performance and egg quality in hens kept in standard or furnished cages. Anim Res, 53:45-57.

Guinebretière, M., Huneau-Salaün, A., Huonnic, D., Michel, V. (2012). Cage hygiene, laying location, and egg quality: The effects of linings and litter provision in furnished cages for laying hens. Poultry Sci, 91: 808-816.

Hardin, E., Castro, F., Kim, W. (2019). Keel bone injury in laying hens: The prevalence of injuries in relation to different housing systems, implications, and potential solutions. World's Poultry Science Journal, 75(2): 285-292. DOI:10.1017/S0043933919000011

Harlander-Matauschek, A., Rodenburg, T.B., Sandilands, V., Tobalske, B.W., Toscano, M.J. (2015). Causes of keel bone damage and their solutions in laying hens. World's. Poult Sci J, 71:461-472. DOI: 10.1017/s0043933915002135

Heerkens, J.L., Delezie, E., Ampe, B., Rodenburg, T.B., Tuyttens, F.A. (2016). Ramps and hybrid effects on keel bone and foot pad disorders in modified aviaries for laying hens. Poult Sci, 95(11):2479-2488. DOI: 10.3382/ps/pew157

Hewson, C. (2003). What is animal welfare? Common definitions and their practical consequences. Can Vet J, 44(6): 496-499. PMID: 12839246

Hofmann, T., Schmucker, S., Bessei, W., Grashorn, M., Stefanski, V. (2020). Impact of housing environment on the immune system in chickens: a review. Animals, 10:1138. DOI: 10.3390/ani10071138

Hofmann, T., Schmucker, S., Grashorn, M., Stefanski, V. (2021). Short- and long-term consequences of stocking density during rearing on the immune system and welfare of laying hens. Poultry Science, 100 (8): 101243. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101243

Hunniford, M.E., Torrey, S., Bédécarrats, G., Duncan, I.J., Widowski, T.M. (2014). Evidence of competition for nest sites by laying hens in large furnished cages. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 161: 95-104.

Hunniford, M.E., Widowski, T.M. (2016). Rearing environment and laying location affect prelaying behavior in enriched cages. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 181: 205-213.

Hunniford, M.E., Widowski, T.M. (2017). Nest alternatives: Adding a wire partition to the scratch area affects nest use and nesting behaviour of laying hens in furnished cages. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 186: 29-34.

Kittelsen, K.E., Moe, R.O., Hansen, T.B., Toftaker, I., Christensen, J.P., Vasdal, G. (2020). A Descriptive Study of Keel Bone Fractures in Hens and Roosters from Four Non-Commercial Laying Breeds Housed in Furnished Cages. Animals, 10:2192. DOI:10.3390/ani10112192

Kollenda, E., Baldock, D., Hiller, N., Lorant, A. (2020). Transitioning towards cage-free farming in the EU: Assessment of environmental and socio-economic impacts of increased animal welfare standards. Policy report by the Institute for European Environmental Policy, Brussels & London.

Lambton, S.L., Nicol, C.J., Friel, M., Main, D.C.J, McKinstry, J.L., Sherwin, C.M., Walton, J., Weeks, C.A. (2013). A bespoke management package can reduce levels of injurious pecking in loose-housed laying hen flocks. Veterinary Record, pp.vetrec2012

Louton, H., Bergmann, S., Reese, S., Erhard, M.H., Rauch, E. (2016). Dust-bathing behavior of laying hens in enriched colony housing systems and an aviary system. Poultry Science, 00:1–10.

Mackie N. 2019. Data-driven housing designs to improve bone health and welfare in laying hens. Thesis (Ph.D.) University of Bristol

Mench, J.A., Blatchford, R.A. (2014). Determination of space use by laying hens using kinematic analysis. Poultry Science, 93(4):794-798.

Moreno-Madriñan, M.J., Kontowicz, E. (2023). Stocking Density and Homogeneity, Considerations on Pandemic Potential. Zoonotic Diseases, 3(2): 85-92. DOI: 10.3390/zoonoticdis3020008

Nasr, M.A.F,, Alkhedaide, A.Q., Ramadan, A.A.I., Hafez, A.S.E., Hussein, M.A. (2021). Potential impact of stocking density on growth, carcass traits, indicators of biochemical and oxidative stress and meat quality of different broiler breeds. Poultry Science, 100(11): 101442. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101442

Nicol, C.J., Bestman, M., Gilani, A.M., De Haas, E.N., De Jong, I.C., Lambton, S., Wagenaar, J.P., Weeks, C.A., Rodenburg, T.B. (2013). The prevention and control of feather pecking: Application to commercial systems. World’s Poult Sci J, 69:775-788. DOI: 10.1017/S0043933913000809

Norman, K.I., Weeks, C.A., Tarlton, J.F., Nicol, C.J. (2021). Rearing experience with ramps improves specific learning and behaviour and welfare on a commercial laying farm. Sci Rep, 11:8860. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-88347-9

Olgun, O., Aygun, A. (2016). Nutritional factors affecting the breaking strength of bone in laying hens. World’s Poult Sci, 72:821–832. DOI: 10.1017/S0043933916000696

Pettersson, I.C., Weeks, C.A., Nicol, C.J. (2017). The effect of ramp provision on the accessibility of the litter in single and multi-tier laying hen housing. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 186:35-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2016.10.012

Platz, S., Heyn, E., Hergt, F., Weigl, B., Erhard, M. (2009). Comparative study on the behaviour, health and productivity of laying hens in a furnished cage and an aviary system. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 122(7/8):235-40.

Rakonjac, S., Bogosavljević-Bošković, S., Pavlovski, Z., Škrbić, Z., Dosković, V., Petrović, M.D., Petričević, V. (2014). Laying hen rearing systems: A review of major production results and egg quality traits. World’s Poultry Science Journal 70 (1): 93–104. DOI:10.1017/S0043933914000087

Rana, M.S., Cohen-Barnhouse, A.M., Lee, C., Campbell, D.L.M. (2021). Preference testing for UV light spectrum and intensity in laying hens. Poult Sci, 100. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101063.

Regmi, P., Smith, N., Nelson, N., Haut, R.C., Orth, M.W., Karcher, D.M. (2016). Housing conditions alter properties of the tibia and humerus during the laying phase in Lohmann white Leghorn hens. Poult Sci, 95(1):198-206. DOI: 10.3382/ps/pev209

Riber, A.B., Casey-Trott, T.M., Herskin, M.S. (2018). The Influence of Keel Bone Damage on Welfare of Laying Hens. Front Vet Sc, 5:6. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00006.

Riddle, E.R., Ali, A.B., Campbell, D.L., Siegford, J.M. (2018). Space use by 4 strains of laying hens to perch, wing flap, dust bathe, stand and lie down. PloS One, 13(1):e0190532.

Rodenburg, T.B. (2020). End the cage age: Looking for alternatives. European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/658539/IPOL_STU(2020)658539_EN.pdf. Accessed on March 16. 2023.

Rodenburg, T.B., Giersberg, M.F., Petersan, P., Shields, S. (2022). Freeing the hens: Workshop outcomes for applying ethology to the development of cage-free housing systems in the commercial egg industry. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 251: 105629. DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2022.105629

Rodenburg, T.B., Tuyttens, F., De Reu, K., de Herman, L., Zoons, J., Sonck, B. (2005a). Welfare assessment of laying hens in furnished cages and alternative systems: assimilating expert opinion. In: Assessment of Animal Welfare at Farm and Group Level - 3rd International Workshop WAFL-05. Vienna, Austria. ISSN 0962-7286. pp. 355-361.

Rodenburg, T.B., Tuyttens, F., De Reu, K., Herman, L., Zoons, J., Sonck, B. (2008). Welfare assessment of laying hens in furnished cages and non-cage systems: an on-farm comparison. Animal Welfare, 17(4):363-373.

Rodenburg, T.B., Tuyttens, F., Sonck, B. (2005b). Welfare, health, and hygiene of laying hens housed in furnished cages and in alternative housing systems. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 8(3):211-26. DOI: 10.1207/s15327604jaws0803_5

Rodenburg, T.B., van Krimpen, M.M., de Jong, I.C., de Haas, E.N., Kops, M.S., Riedstra, B.J., Nordquist, R.E., Wagenaar, J.P., Bestman, M., Nicol, C.J. (2013). The prevention and control of feather pecking in laying hens: identifying the underlying principles. World's Poultry Science Journal, 69(02): 361-374.

Rönchen, S., Scholz, B., Hamann, H., Distl, O. (2007). Foot pad health, plumage condition, integument and claw length of Lohmann Silver laying hens kept in small aviary housing systems, furnished cages and an aviary housing system. Arch Tierz, 50(4): 388-402.

Rufener, C., Makagon, M.M. (2020). Keel bone fractures in laying hens: a systematic review of prevalence across age, housing systems, and strains. Journal of Animal Science, 98(1): 36-51. DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa145

Savory, C.J., Wood-Gush, D.G.M., Duncan, I.J.H. (1978). Feeding behaviour in a population of domestic fowls in the wild. Applied Animal Ethology, 4:13-27.

Savory, J.C., Jack, M.C., Sandilands, V. (2005). Behavioural responses of hens in pens to different floor space allowances. Animal Science Papers and Reports, 23(1):135-41.

Schuck-Paim, C., Negro-Calduch, E., Alonso, W.J. (2021). Laying hen mortality in different indoor housing systems: a meta-analysis of data from commercial farms in 16 countries. Scientific Reports, 11(1): 1-13. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81868-3

Sharma, M.K., White, D., Chen, C., Kim, W.K., Adhikari, P. (2021). Effects of the housing environment and laying hen strain on tibia and femur bone properties of different laying phases of Hy-Line hens. Poultry Science, 100(3): 100933. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.12.030

Sherwin, C.M., Richards, G.J., Nicol, C.J. (2010). Comparison of the welfare of layer hens in 4 housing systems in the UK. Br Poult Sci, 51(4):488-99. DOI: 10.1080/00071668.2010.502518.

Sosnówka-Czajka, Е., Skomorucha, I., Herbut, E. (2021). The welfare status of hens in different housing systems – a review. Ann Anim Sci, 21(4): 1235-1255. DOI: 10.2478/aoas-2021-0021

Stratmann, A., Fröhlich, E.K.F, Harlander-Matauschek, A., Schrader, L., Toscano, M.J., Würbel, H., Gebhardt-Henrich, S.G. (2015b). Soft perches in an aviary system reduce incidence of keel bone damage in laying hens. PLoS One, 10(3):e0122568. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122568

Stratmann, A., Fröhlich, E.K.F., Gebhardt-Henrich, S.G., Harlander-Matauschek, A., Würbel, H., Toscano, M.J. (2015a). Modification of aviary design reduces incidence of falls, collisions and keel bone damage in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 165:112-123

Struelens, E., Tuyttens, F.A., Duchateau, L., Leroy, T., Cox, M., Vranken, E., Buyse, J., Zoons, J., Berckmans, D., Odberg, F., Sonck, B. (2008). Perching behaviour and perch height preference of laying hens in furnished cages varying in height. Br Poult Sci, 49(4):381-9. DOI: 10.1080/00071660802158332

Sugiharto, S. (2022). Dietary strategies to alleviate high-stocking-density-induced stress in broiler chickens - a comprehensive review. Arch Anim Breed, 65: 21-36. DOI: 10.5194/aab-65-21-2022

Tahamtani, F.M., Kittelsen, K., Vasdal. G. (2023). Fearfulness in aviary housed laying hens – Effects of management and potential confounding effects of the Novel Object test. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 260:105794. DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2022.105794

Tarlton, J.F., Wilkins, L.J., Toscano, M.J., Avery, N.C., Knott, L. (2013). Reduced bone breakage and increased bone strength in free range laying hens fed omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplemented diets. Bone, 52 (2):578-586. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.11.003

The Humane Society of the United States. (2010). Welfare Issues with Furnished Cages for Egg-Laying Hens. IMPACTS ON FARM ANIMALS. 14. https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/hsus_reps_impacts_on_animals/14. Accessed on March 12. 2023.

Thøfner, I.C.N., Dahl, J., Christensen, J.P. (2021). Keel bone fractures in Danish laying hens: Prevalence and risk factors. PLoS ONE, 16(8): e0256105. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256105

Toscano, M.J., Dunn, I.C., Christensen, J.P., Petow, S., Kittelsen, K., Ulrich, R. (2020). Explanations for keel bone fractures in laying hens: are there explanations in addition to elevated egg production? Poult Sci, 99(9): 4183-4194. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.05.035

Uzunova, K., Lazarov, L. (2020). Damages of the keel bone in laying hens – overview of the etiological aspects. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 18(1): 19-23. DOI:10.15547/tjs.2020.s.01.004

van Hoorebeke, S., van Immerseel, F., Haesebrouck, F., Ducatelle, R., Dewulf, J. (2010). The influence of the housing system on Salmonella infections in laying hens: a review. Zoonoses and Public Health. DOI: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01372.x

van Horne, P.L.M., Bondt, N. (2023). Competitiveness of the EU egg sector, base year 2021. International comparison of production costs of eggs and egg products. Wageningen Economic Research. ISBN 978-94-6447-538-8. https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/fulltext/583668. Accessed on April 16. 2023.

Villagrá, A., De la Torre, J., Chacón, G., Lainez, M., Torres, A., Manteca, X. (2009). Stocking density and stress induction affect production and stress parameters in broiler chickens. Animal Welfare, 18(2): 189-197. DOI: 10.1017/S0962728600000336

Wall, H., Tauson, R., Elwinger, K. (2008). Effects of litter substrate and genotype on layers' use of litter, exterior appearance, and heterophil:lymphocyte ratios in furnished cages. Poultry Science, 87(12):2458-65.

Webster, A.B. (2004). Welfare implications of avian osteoporosis. Poult Sci, 83(2):184-92. DOI: 10.1093/ps/83.2.184

Webster, A.B. (2004). Welfare implications of avian osteoporosis. Poult Sci, 83(2):184-92. DOI: 10.1093/ps/83.2.184

Wei, H., Bi, Y., Xin, H., Pan, L., Liu, R., Li, X., Li, J., Zhang, R., Bao, J. (2020). Keel fracture changed the behavior and reduced the welfare, production performance, and egg quality in laying hens housed individually in furnished cages. Poultry Science, 99:3334–3342. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.04.001

Weitzenbürger, D., Vits, A., Hamann, H., Distl, O. (2006). Evaluation of small group housing systems and furnished cages as regards particular behaviour patterns in the layer strain Lohmann Selected Leghorn. Archiv für Geflügelkunde, 70(6):250-60.

Whitehead, C.C., Fleming, R.H. (2000). Osteoporosis in cage layers. Poult Sci, 79(7):1033-41. DOI: 10.1093/ps/79.7.1033

World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH). Animal Welfarehttps://www.woah.org/en/what-we-do/animal-health-and-welfare/animal-welfare Accessed on March 15. 2023.

Zhang, R., Yu, H., Wang, Y., Bao, J. (2022). PSXIII-5 Effects of Stocking Density on the Welfare and Immune Responses of Laying Hens Housed in Small Furnished Cages. Journal of Animal Science, 100(3): 204. DOI: 10.1093/jas/skac247.371

Zhao, S.C., Teng, X.Q., Xu, D.L., Chi, X., Ge, M., Xu, S.W. (2020). Influences of low level of dietary calcium on bone characters in laying hens. Poult Sci, 99(12):7084-7091. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.08.057.

Published
2023-08-02
How to Cite
1.
Marincheva V, Manev I. Behind Bars: Why Cage Housing in Laying Hens Should Be Banned . Glob. J. Anim. Sci. Res. [Internet]. 2023Aug.2 [cited 2024May10];11(3):33-5. Available from: http://gjasr.com/index.php/GJASR/article/view/180
Section
Original Articles